Abu Dhabi Court obligates a wife to pay 10000 dirhams in compensation to her husband
The Abu Dhabi Court issued a judicial ruling requiring a wife to pay 10,000 dirhams in compensation to her husband because she beat him, causing him pain and sadness.
Read also
It is the responsibility of the Abu Dhabi Court to order a wife to compensate her husband with ten thousand dirhams.
The Abu Dhabi Court made a verdict that mandated a wife to compensate her husband with 10,000 dirhams. The reason for the ruling was that the wife had beaten her husband, which caused him to experience agony and anguish.
10 thousand dirhams in compensation for a man who was beaten by his wife in the Emirates
A guy who was beaten by his wife in the Emirates was awarded ten thousand dirhams as compensation, A woman is required to pay her husband a sum of 10,000 dirhams as compensation for the material and moral losses he sustained as a result of her assault and beating on him, according to a ruling made by the Abu Dhabi Family, Civil and Administrative Claims Court. His injuries included both physical and emotional harm. In the specifics, a man of Asian nationality filed a lawsuit against his wife, demanding that she be obligated to pay him fifty thousand dirhams in compensation for the material and moral damages he suffered as a result of the beating that he endured. Additionally, the man demanded that she be obligated to pay fees and expenses as well as attorney's fees, and the ruling included immediate enforcement without bail. bringing attention to the fact that the defendant assaulted his body and was responsible for the injuries that were described in the evaluation report. The accused was found guilty of criminal offenses and given a fine of two thousand dirhams. Meanwhile, the defendant went before the court and presented a memorandum in which she demanded that the case be dismissed.
Punishment for a wife hitting her husband in the UAE
In the United Arab Emirates, the punishment for a wife who hits her husband, The court explained in the merits of its ruling that what is clear in the papers is that the error by which the defendant was convicted was the same error on which the plaintiff relied in filing the present case, and the criminal ruling, if it decided to convict on the basis of proving the error on her part of assaulting the integrity of the plaintiff's body, would have been decided separately. This error was the same error that the plaintiff relied on in filing the present case. Within the context of the occurrence of the conduct that serves as the common basis for both criminal and civil actions, as well as within the legal description of this act and its attribution to the person who committed it, it is essential. Regarding the plaintiff's claim for fifty thousand dirhams in material and moral compensation, the court stated that the defendant was found to be at fault. The plaintiff suffered material damage as a result of the beating, which was represented by the pain that was inflicted on him, as stated in the medical report that was attached to the case. Additionally, a criminal report was opened in the police and transportation department, and the criminal case was followed up on. As a result of that encounter, he had feelings of sadness, fear, and sadness, which mirrored the moral damage he had sustained. As a result of the court's decision, the defendant is now required to pay the plaintiff a sum of 10,000 dollars, in addition to paying the costs and expenditures.
